A Note from the Front: This Epstein Witness' Affidavit Implicates Trump Bigly - It's the Biggest, Bestest... Most Disgusting
And it's been known about for nearly 10 years.
I really wasn’t planning to spend this much time on Epstein and Trump, and hopefully this is my penultimate post about this, but I keep finding actual court-certified documents, and I know that a lot of you are hungry for actual, you know, facts - or at least witness testimony made under oath.
Actually my next post is a combination of court documents, witness testimony, and a whole lot more: it is the full grand jury testimony from the 2006 Palm Beach County grand jury inquiry during the first Epstein investigation. Nearly 150 pages of grand jury stuff. THAT I am releasing only to members of my Notes from the Front group (if you want in join here). I’ll be posting that tomorrow.
But back to today’s find: In 2016 Trump and Epstein were sued for statutory rape by a ‘Jane Doe’ who said that they had sex with her when she was 13, and that they knew she was only 13. (Notes from the Front members will find a PDF of the full complaint in that lawsuit at the bottom of this article.)
The “statutory” in statutory rape means that it is written and defined right in the law. There is almost no legal defense for statutory rape, including that you didn’t know that the person was underage. In fact even if they lied and told you that they were 18, it doesn’t matter. So nearly zero defense. I say “nearly” zero because there are a few, very specific defenses in some states, like if the parties have less than a two-year age difference (not the case here), or if the defendent has such a low IQ that they lack mental capacity (hrmmm).
Pseudonymous lawsuits (i.e. the “Jane Doe” who filed this lawsuit) by plaintiffs are a legal mechanism that allows a party to remain anonymous to the general public, but, and this is very important: the court and the attorneys know who they are. (When the Doe is one or more defendants it instead means that the plaintiff knows there are other possible defendants, but doesn’t know who they are yet - they expect their identities to come out during discovery.)
The lawsuit was filed, then dropped, then filed again, and then dropped again. One of Jane Doe’s attorneys, Lisa Bloom, said that her client had been threatened and was in great fear. (Does anybody not believe that?)
So, now you’re up to speed, and what I have for you is the written, sworn affadavit of “Tiffany Roe” (another pseudonym). And it’s bombshell territory. It’s also disturbing, so you have been warned.
While I’m including the entire PDF of the affidavit for our Notes from the Front members, here are some quotes for our free subscribers, enough to give you an idea:
“I was hired by and paid directly by Mr. Epstein from the years of 1991-2000 to attract adolescent women to attend these parties, most of which were held at what is known as the Wexner Mansion located at 9 E. 71st St. in New York City.”
“In June, 1994 while performing my duties as a recruiter of adolescent women to attend Mr. Epstein's parties, I met a 13-year-old adolescent woman, the Plaintiff in this matter, at the Port Authority in New York City who said that she had come to New York City in the hope of starting a modeling career.”
“It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.”
This may be enough for you at this point, but if you want the full thing, it’s in the PDF below.
The Complaint (the document that is filed with the court and starts the lawsuit), the full PDF of which is also included below for Notes from the Front members, includes:
“Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.”
Before you go on, be warned that the documents - especially the Complaint - contain graphic (not to mention gross) descriptions of our president.